Talk:Conflux/Path of Joramun - Revision history

Chf: Discussion continued…

2012-11-07T08:22:23Z

Discussion continued…

@@ Line 37: / Line 37: @@
 --[[User:Chf|CHF]] 03:08, 7 November 2012 (CET)
-Yawn, you are so oppressed.  This wiki was inactive for 6 months before I started work on it and *then* you decide to start back up after I comment in the forums?  <insert your favorite invecative here>  I picked up the batton when you dropped it on March 18, 2012.  I start new content and before I even finish you start changing things on me and you expect me to respect you?  So, no, I'm not interested *anymore* in collaborating with *you*.  I never asked for or wanted your "help".  You needlessly add obvious and redundant information, you have a perverse avertion to punctuation and grammer(drunken? that's an adjective not a verb.), you mis-sort entries, add first person dialog and un-tested conjecture.
+Yawn, you are so oppressed. [[User:Phoenix|Phoenix]] 05:20, 7 November 2012 (CET)
-:The game manual character that you desire lives in the unfinished (not even begun) "story" articles, why don't you write some if that is your goal?
+:I am not. --[[User:Chf|CHF]] 09:22, 7 November 2012 (CET)
-That's *exactly* what I'm talking with Zyx about.  This indeed is a Wiki, but ultimately it's Zyx's wiki.  By making it a wiki, he gets others to do a lot of the heavy lifting for him while he works on other things.  I volunteered to help him, not collaborate with you.  It would indeed be different if there were multiple people working on this wiki, but when I started, there was *no one*.  So if all of this offends you or convinces *you* to go away, then as Bender of Futurama would say, "My work here is done."
+This wiki was inactive for 6 months before I started work on it and *then* you decide to start back up after I comment in the forums?  <insert your favorite invecative here>  [[User:Phoenix|Phoenix]] 05:20, 7 November 2012 (CET)
-If Zyx agrees with my proposal there will be an opportunity and encouragement for other contributers to edit the wiki in a contest I've suggested.  If *he* tells me he doesn't want me to work on the wiki anymore, I'll just go back to commenting and adding bug reports in the forum, but *you* can talk the the hand.
+:Yes, that is a COINCIDENCE, I had no time for a while and merely forgotten Conflux and got back to it recently, and I was surprised that you had that much interest, and I was glad to be not the only person editing this Wiki. --[[User:Chf|CHF]] 09:22, 7 November 2012 (CET)
-[[User:Phoenix|Phoenix]] 05:20, 7 November 2012 (CET)
+I picked up the batton when you dropped it on March 18, 2012. [[User:Phoenix|Phoenix]] 05:20, 7 November 2012 (CET)

Phoenix: whipping the "slave"

2012-11-07T04:20:43Z

whipping the "slave"

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:20, 7 November 2012
Line 36:		Line 36:

	--[[User:Chf\|CHF]] 03:08, 7 November 2012 (CET)		--[[User:Chf\|CHF]] 03:08, 7 November 2012 (CET)

			Yawn, you are so oppressed. This wiki was inactive for 6 months before I started work on it and then you decide to start back up after I comment in the forums? <insert your favorite invecative here> I picked up the batton when you dropped it on March 18, 2012. I start new content and before I even finish you start changing things on me and you expect me to respect you? So, no, I'm not interested anymore in collaborating with you. I never asked for or wanted your "help". You needlessly add obvious and redundant information, you have a perverse avertion to punctuation and grammer(drunken? that's an adjective not a verb.), you mis-sort entries, add first person dialog and un-tested conjecture.
			You call me out on stuff you haven't even tested. The creatures pages have tons of blanks that need to be filled in, but do you help with that or work on other needed content? No. All I've seen you do besides edit Level notes(which is wrong in multiple places) is alter stuff I've recently added without the "discussion" you claim to desire. I give you back a taste of your own medicine and now you're upset?

			:The game manual character that you desire lives in the unfinished (not even begun) "story" articles, why don't you write some if that is your goal?

			That's exactly what I'm talking with Zyx about. This indeed is a Wiki, but ultimately it's Zyx's wiki. By making it a wiki, he gets others to do a lot of the heavy lifting for him while he works on other things. I volunteered to help him, not collaborate with you. It would indeed be different if there were multiple people working on this wiki, but when I started, there was no one. So if all of this offends you or convinces you to go away, then as Bender of Futurama would say, "My work here is done."

			If Zyx agrees with my proposal there will be an opportunity and encouragement for other contributers to edit the wiki in a contest I've suggested. If he tells me he doesn't want me to work on the wiki anymore, I'll just go back to commenting and adding bug reports in the forum, but you can talk the the hand.

			[[User:Phoenix\|Phoenix]] 05:20, 7 November 2012 (CET)

Chf: Long answer about the Wiki's possible future.

2012-11-07T02:08:02Z

Long answer about the Wiki's possible future.

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:08, 7 November 2012
Line 8:		Line 8:

	[[User:Phoenix\|Phoenix]] 01:53, 7 November 2012 (CET)		[[User:Phoenix\|Phoenix]] 01:53, 7 November 2012 (CET)

			''"Because the entry is Jormuns personal entry not yours."''

			This is why the note was indented and in italics. Even an idiot would have seen that this wasn't belonging to the original text. I do not want to mislead beginners, do you? So why don't you delete this thing as a whole then, since it is obviously deprecated?

			''"You have a problem with that take it up with Zyx. You should also know that I'm in negotiations with Zyx to completely change the format of ALL Places pages to get rid of all that connections and interests crap."''

			Please note that this is a WIKI. A Wiki lives from cooperation, not from people taking it over. So different approaches and opinions about what it should contain and what not. need to be '''discussed'''. It also lives from respect for the work of other authors, which means especially that deletions have to be carefully considered, while additions and corrections as well as layout changes are generally much less of a problem.

			I fully agree that the old page format can be reworked, but since I had no idea I considered good enough as of now, I've continued with the "traditional" format.

			''"I look at this wiki like the manual you would get with a new game not a fucking walkthrough."''

			Well, that is YOUR point of view. Whatever you are currently discussing with Zyx, the Wiki itsself says something completely different than you do above:

			'''"The following may be seen has a Walkthrough for Conflux. It can also be described as a collective effort to decrypt Conflux wealth. Do not read further if you want to discover the incredibly complex world of this dungeon on your own."'''

			This means that it WAS once intended to be full of spoilers and a complete reference, as well as a normal game manual. This is not a printed book, there is no commercial need to keep things out of it. The game manual character that you desire lives in the unfinished (not even begun) "story" articles, why don't you write some if that is your goal? This Wiki can contain sort of a non-linear walkthrough AS WELL AS a "classic style" game manual, there is no contradiction, simply because space is not really limited, and the player can - as long as appropriate spoiler warnings are given, and as long as there are enough "grades of detail" are provided by the Wiki as a whole - easily decide on their own how much they want to read and how much to discover themselves.

			Whenever I am tempted to delete information about the game because it might spoil too much, I usually write something new and put the more explicit information elsewhere, leaving it to the users to decide whether they want to read it or not. I, for example, would appreciate a place where I can look up the location of item X that I found in my last game, but don't exactly remember now. There is no reason whatsoever in my opinion to delete such information, while there might be many reasons to bury it a level deeper in order to reduce spoilers. If you seek help in the Wiki you definitely should not "accidentally" have to read half a walkthrough spoiling the game, it should be possible to look up specific bits of information.

			''"If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here. Get used to it."''

			I am not complaining about your (or anybody else's) editing as such, just because of a lack of discussion about this. You have your opinion about what this Wiki should be like, and are obviously not willing to discuss its nature with anybody else than Zyx. Again, this is a WIKI, we are not working for a commercial company. In most such companies it is unfortunately common that people discuss their ideas with the boss (Zyx here), and if he agrees (or doesn't disagree), these ideas can be "rightfully impressed" onto the rest of the world. Volunteer projects like this, however, live from collaboration, not from survival of the ideas which have been most impressively presented to the bosses. Collaboration also means that nobody can decide on their own where the project goes… or do you want to complete it on your own? You won't find "slaves" who restrict their collaboration to fixing your orthographical errors and such, leaving all important decisions about the Wiki's nature and allowed contents in your hands, no matter how much knowledge you have acquired about Conflux that other people might lack of.

			The "talk" pages like this one exist for any page in the Wiki. This is the place where the discussion about its future should take place, not in private between you and Zyx, and me and Zyx, and so on.

			--[[User:Chf\|CHF]] 03:08, 7 November 2012 (CET)

Phoenix at 01:10, 7 November 2012

2012-11-07T01:10:53Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:10, 7 November 2012
Line 3:		Line 3:
	Because the entry is Jormuns personal entry not yours. Putting the note outside preseves that articles historical integrity. It's one thing to change tech articles, it's another to change a personal entry. The Wiki is not supposed to be an explicit spoiler. There is NO need to have the spoiler for the lockpics! The Champions page has been updated and ALL those items are now gone.		Because the entry is Jormuns personal entry not yours. Putting the note outside preseves that articles historical integrity. It's one thing to change tech articles, it's another to change a personal entry. The Wiki is not supposed to be an explicit spoiler. There is NO need to have the spoiler for the lockpics! The Champions page has been updated and ALL those items are now gone.

	Please stop with all the god damn spoilers! You have a problem with that take it up with Zyx. You should also know that I'm in negotiations with Zyx to completely change the format of ALL Places pages to get rid of all that connections and interests crap. I look at this wiki like the manual you would get with a new game not a fucking ~~walkthrough~~.		Please stop with all the god damn spoilers! You have a problem with that take it up with Zyx. You should also know that I'm in negotiations with Zyx to completely change the format of ALL Places pages to get rid of all that connections and interests crap. I look at this wiki like the manual you would get with a new game not a fucking "hold my hand I'm to stupid to think for my self" cheat guide.

	If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here. Get used to it.		If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here. Get used to it.

	[[User:Phoenix\|Phoenix]] 01:53, 7 November 2012 (CET)		[[User:Phoenix\|Phoenix]] 01:53, 7 November 2012 (CET)

Phoenix: comment

2012-11-07T00:53:17Z

comment

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:53, 7 November 2012
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Phoenix, why don't you want to be specific? We KNOW what part of the information is outdated, so, if you consider my writings to be too much of a spoiler, extend the spoiler tags, but DO NOT delete essential parts of the provided information without discussion! If you see more than just that bit of outdated information (I DID see something), and don't want to "overflow" the article with more notes, please consider what is important for new players, and what isn't. Nowadays, Iaido won't give automatically the desired lockpicks, while you can follow the rest of Joramuns advice without running into much of a problem, despite of this probably not being your preferred approach. For your preferred approaches I suggest that you write new articles about the "Paths of Phoenix". The locations still look like he described them, the monsters are also still there, so why was there a need to delete information? --[[User:Chf\|CHF]] 01:17, 7 November 2012 (CET)		Phoenix, why don't you want to be specific? We KNOW what part of the information is outdated, so, if you consider my writings to be too much of a spoiler, extend the spoiler tags, but DO NOT delete essential parts of the provided information without discussion! If you see more than just that bit of outdated information (I DID see something), and don't want to "overflow" the article with more notes, please consider what is important for new players, and what isn't. Nowadays, Iaido won't give automatically the desired lockpicks, while you can follow the rest of Joramuns advice without running into much of a problem, despite of this probably not being your preferred approach. For your preferred approaches I suggest that you write new articles about the "Paths of Phoenix". The locations still look like he described them, the monsters are also still there, so why was there a need to delete information? --[[User:Chf\|CHF]] 01:17, 7 November 2012 (CET)

			Because the entry is Jormuns personal entry not yours. Putting the note outside preseves that articles historical integrity. It's one thing to change tech articles, it's another to change a personal entry. The Wiki is not supposed to be an explicit spoiler. There is NO need to have the spoiler for the lockpics! The Champions page has been updated and ALL those items are now gone.

			Please stop with all the god damn spoilers! You have a problem with that take it up with Zyx. You should also know that I'm in negotiations with Zyx to completely change the format of ALL Places pages to get rid of all that connections and interests crap. I look at this wiki like the manual you would get with a new game not a fucking walkthrough.

			If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here. Get used to it.

			[[User:Phoenix\|Phoenix]] 01:53, 7 November 2012 (CET)

Chf: moved Talk:Conflux/Path of Joramund to Talk:Conflux/Path of Joramun: Name of user in the DM Forum is "Joramun", not "Joramund".

2012-11-07T00:17:56Z

moved Talk:Conflux/Path of Joramund to Talk:Conflux/Path of Joramun: Name of user in the DM Forum is "Joramun", not "Joramund".

← Older revision	Revision as of 00:17, 7 November 2012
(No difference)

Chf: Discussion entry about lates edits, particularly deletion of information.

2012-11-07T00:17:12Z

Discussion entry about lates edits, particularly deletion of information.

New page

Phoenix, why don't you want to be specific? We KNOW what part of the information is outdated, so, if you consider my writings to be too much of a spoiler, extend the spoiler tags, but DO NOT delete essential parts of the provided information without discussion! If you see more than just that bit of outdated information (I DID see something), and don't want to "overflow" the article with more notes, please consider what is important for new players, and what isn't. Nowadays, Iaido won't give automatically the desired lockpicks, while you can follow the rest of Joramuns advice without running into much of a problem, despite of this probably not being your preferred approach. For your preferred approaches I suggest that you write new articles about the "Paths of Phoenix". The locations still look like he described them, the monsters are also still there, so why was there a need to delete information? --[[User:Chf|CHF]] 01:17, 7 November 2012 (CET)